The Alaska AI Docket

The ordinance goes to the Planning Commission for a recommendation due in 90 days and then back to the elected Assembly, which adopts or rejects it.

There is no comment room on this one yet. The university says it plans listening sessions and online surveys this fall, and as of September 16th no session dates had been scheduled. The document binding users today is a security standard issued through the Office of Information Technology rather than anything the regents have voted on, and it has been in effect since January 2025. It applies to the UA System and all users of UA computing resources, and violations may subject employees to disciplinary action up to and including termination and students to disciplinary action including expulsion.

The Assembly took public testimony on September 15th and then held the ordinance without voting, so the next opportunity is the regular meeting on October 20th. Anyone relying on that date should confirm the item is on the published agenda before showing up, because the municipality's agenda system refuses an automated request and the ordinance text is still not readable anywhere this record can reach.

There is no comment room on a bill. The route is the congressional delegation, and after enactment it becomes a proceeding at the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, which is a room with a docket and a public record. The House passed the bill on September 16th and the Senate declined to take it up on September 30th, so it waits on the lame-duck session that opens November 9th.

The borough has already voted, so the room that was open is closed. What the resolution does is hand the question to two bodies that have not acted on it. A reader who wants the moratorium considered asks a legislator to carry it when the Legislature convenes in January 2027, or asks the congressional delegation to take up the federal half. The resolution itself, its full text and the meeting record are public through the borough clerk.

A member-owned co-op board decides, in executive session. GVEA members reach it through board elections and member comment periods at regular meetings.

The comment room is closed. Written comment on ADL 234762 ran from July 10th through September 14th, the state's notice archived the day after, and Alaska DNR received more than 2,100 comments. Only people from whom the division received timely written comment during that period may appeal the Final Finding and Decision, so the appeal stays open to those who wrote in and is shut to everyone else. No final finding and decision has been published. Houston's city council heard a two-year moratorium on new data center construction on October 8th, and no outcome could be found as of October 11th. The Senate Resources Committee has scheduled Natural Resources Commissioner John Crowther to appear on October 26th after voting to subpoena him.

Alaska's electric cooperatives are governed by boards their own members elect, so a member can ask their board directly whether it intends to sign. A voluntary federal pledge has no public comment docket, which is why this room is indirect rather than open.

Only eligible applicants reached this one, and applications closed on August 27th, 2026, so no public path remains. An Alaskan reached it through a tribe, an ANCSA village or a Native nonprofit that filed in time. Applications are evaluated privately and no awardee has been named.

An elected school board decides, and its regular meetings carry a public comment period. There is no formal comment window on these documents and no published date for a final vote, so an Alaskan reaches this one through a board member or from the podium at a meeting.

The borough commits money to North Slope Power by Assembly resolution and mayoral contract, so the elected borough government is the path in. The deal's financial structure has not been made public.

Legislators decide; constituents reach them directly. The gas line would feed the grid most Alaska compute would ride on.

The elected Anchorage Assembly adopted the ordinance in a public 10 to 2 vote. Residents reach it through Assembly elections and public testimony.

Copper Valley Electric is a member owned cooperative, so its board answers to ratepayers who elect it. The project is tabled, so there is nothing before the board to comment on now.

The Assembly enacted the ordinance as amended on October 20th, after its public hearing, and the new code section is in effect. It reaches borough land only.

The bill stalled in a House committee before the session ended. Any revival starts over in the next Legislature, where it goes to the legislators you elect on November 3rd.

The Assembly has voted and the motion failed on a tie, so nothing is pending. The question can come back only if a member brings it to a future Assembly meeting, where residents can speak during public comment.